Tiranga March Crackdown: AISA’s Neha Bora Released, CJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Produced Before Magistrate
AISA president Neha Bora was released early on Saturday after being detained ahead of the Lehra Do Tiranga march in Delhi, while CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke was arrested under preventive provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and produced before a Special Executive Magistrate. A later update said the court granted him bail, with a peace bond. Bora called the detentions illegal.
- AISA president Neha Bora was released early on Saturday after being detained ahead of the Lehra Do Tiranga march in Delhi, while CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke was arrested under preventive provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and produced before a Special Executive Magistrate.
- A later update said the court granted him bail, with a peace bond.
- Bora called the detentions illegal.
Tiranga March Crackdown: AISA's Neha Bora Released, CJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Produced Before Magistrate
Delhi Police have released All India Students' Association president Neha Bora after detaining her ahead of the "Lehra Do Tiranga" march in Connaught Place, while Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke was arrested and produced before a Special Executive Magistrate. The developments followed a day of tight security in central Delhi, with Central Park closed to the public and heavy police deployment around the proposed protest venue.
The Detentions on Friday
Both leaders were taken into preventive custody on Friday, October 16, as police moved to stop the march. Bora was on her way to Mandi House for the protest when she was detained and was taken to RK Puram police station, although her organisation claimed she had been taken to an office in Mangolpuri. Dipke was initially detained and later formally arrested. Delhi Police described the detentions as preventive measures taken to maintain law and order during the demonstrations, in view of the prohibitory orders in force in the area.
Neha Bora Released
Bora was released early on Saturday morning after formal procedures under Section 65 of the Delhi Police Act. After her release, she criticised the police and the government at the Centre, calling the detentions illegal. She said police had been detaining people in the evening during the movement and releasing them the next morning or evening, and she demanded the release of all detained protesters, including Dipke. She also alleged that she was denied timely access to legal help while in custody.
Dipke Arrested Under the BNSS
Police initiated action against Dipke under Sections 126 and 170 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, which deal with preventive action in anticipation of a breach of peace. He was arrested in what police described as a fresh case for breach of peace and was to be produced before the Special Executive Magistrate at Mandir Marg police station. The court was to decide whether he would be sent to jail or released on bail.
In a later update, the magistrate's court granted Dipke bail subject to certain conditions, including compliance with a peace bond, and ordered his release on Saturday evening.
What Happened at Connaught Place
On Friday, security personnel cordoned off Central Park, with Rapid Action Force personnel deployed inside and additional forces stationed around Connaught Place. Even after the two leaders were detained, hundreds of students and young people, along with some Left members of Parliament, gathered near the venue. They did not attempt to enter the closed park but took rounds of it carrying the national flag along the Inner Circle, resulting in a much toned-down protest. Reports differed on how many protesters were detained, with some accounts saying police did not take other protesters into custody.
Background and Reactions
The march was called to protest against the detention of CJP co-convenors Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka and to press demands connected to the Election Commission and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Supporters of the movement say the use of preventive custody and the closure of the venue amount to suppression of peaceful dissent, while the authorities say the restrictions were necessary to maintain public order. The conditions attached to Dipke's bail and the peace bond could shape how the party plans future protests.
The episode adds to an already heated debate over the right to assemble, the use of preventive detention provisions and the role of the courts in checking such measures. Legal experts are likely to examine whether the use of the BNSS sections was proportionate, and the issue may eventually be taken up in higher courts.
This report is based on published news coverage and statements attributed to the individuals and authorities involved. Allegations made by activists have not been independently verified.
Rajath Kankar
Journalist · BHARATHINN
