Ladakh Administration Rebuts Claims About Excise Policy, Urges Public to Check Facts

The administration of the Union Territory of Ladakh has responded to public claims about its excise policy, disputing allegations that the authorities were expanding liquor outlets across the region. The administration said the newer policy had been withdrawn following public feedback and that the previous policy had been restored.

Administration Explains Policy Changes

According to the administration's statement, the Excise Policy 2026–27 was notified on June 1, 2026. It said concerns and suggestions from residents and social organisations were subsequently taken into account, and the Lieutenant Governor rolled back the policy on August 26.

The administration added that the proposal to open wine shops under the new policy was withdrawn and the related auction notice cancelled. The earlier Excise Policy 2025–26 was restored through a notification dated August 26 and, according to the official clarification, remains in force.

What the Administration Says About Liquor Shops

The official statement said the restored policy permitted two liquor shops in Leh, in wards 4 and 6. It stated that one shop in ward 6 became operational following an auction on October 14, while no bid was received for the ward 4 outlet. On that basis, the administration said only one liquor shop was operating across Ladakh at the time of its statement.

The administration also provided figures for establishments serving alcohol as part of restaurant or bar operations. It said 50 retail liquor outlets associated with bars and restaurants were operational across Leh, Nubra, Zanskar and Changthang, along with two beer bars in Leh. These categories are distinct from standalone liquor shops, and the figures should be understood in the context of the official explanation.

Public Concerns and Official Response

Debates over excise policy can involve concerns about local culture, public health, tourism, commercial activity and the location of licensed establishments. In Ladakh, where communities have expressed views about social and cultural issues, public consultation can be an important part of policy discussions.

The administration's statement disputed claims made by activist Sonam Wangchuk about the policy. Those statements and the administration's response represent opposing positions in the public debate; the details of the notifications and licensing arrangements provide the relevant factual context for evaluating them.

Why Policy Details Matter

Changes to excise rules can affect licensing, auctions and the number or type of permitted establishments. A clear distinction between a proposed policy, a policy that has been withdrawn and rules currently in force is therefore essential when discussing the issue.

The administration has urged the public to check official information before drawing conclusions. Further discussion of the policy is likely to depend on the implementation of the restored rules, community feedback and any future notifications issued by the authorities.